{"id":53548,"date":"2025-08-02T04:09:22","date_gmt":"2025-08-02T02:09:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arbrea-labs.com\/?p=53548"},"modified":"2025-08-06T11:34:46","modified_gmt":"2025-08-06T09:34:46","slug":"the-real-cost-of-not-adapting-to-progress-in-the-aesthetic-medical-field","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arbrea-labs.com\/fr\/the-real-cost-of-not-adapting-to-progress-in-the-aesthetic-medical-field\/","title":{"rendered":"The Real Cost of Not Adapting to Progress in the Aesthetic Medical Field"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t

Digital transformation of the Aesthetic Medical field. Yeah, we hear it all the time, but what does it truly mean?<\/p>\n

To simplify this complicated term, it means that a lot of clinics and plastic surgeons have integrated AI, AR & 3D solutions into their workflow. A lot of them, though, perceive it as an added cost.<\/p>\n

However, these solutions are essential<\/a>. That’s what we at Arbrea Labs believe and know from what we have heard and seen ourselves. And this is the reason we believe that the mindset of these solutions being perceived as added costs is outdated. Not only that, but it’s limiting too. When clearly it’s a conversion-driving opportunity. Let’s see why.<\/p>\n

The Real Cost Behind Choosing Hardware Tools<\/strong><\/h2>\n

First, let’s dive into something more concrete<\/a>. There are hardware tools (Quantificare, Canfield) that offer the 3D simulations too. They are really precise, which is great for patient trust. However, not so good when it comes down to efficiency and price.<\/p>\n

These hardware tools take a long time to process the images in order to render the simulation. Immediately your consultation time goes up, and the number of patients you can attend significantly decreases. Your costs go up here.<\/p>\n

Also, the equipment cost is from $9,000 up to $20,000. These are the prices for new equipment, and as for the used ones, they are lower. But can you trust used equipment? They can break more easily and need fixes, updates, and maintenance. All of that translates into more costs for you.<\/p>\n

Let’s not forget the fact that they will require a dedicated room. You cannot move them around as you please, and they need a designated place. So one less room for you to use. And equipment is fragile. Fixing even a small thing will be quite something. Plus, support for them takes time, because you need to submit a ticket and then wait for the technicians to come. On top of that, if you need a part to be changed, you will wait even more. The ordering, processing, and then changing it is a hassle you would not want. The costs here went up 4 more times besides the equipment.<\/p>\n

So you chose a hardware tool for 3D simulations because you thought, yeah this will be better than software. Your costs went through the roof, and you invited more trouble into your life. If you would have gone with Arbrea Suite, you would be relaxing. And you would have eliminated the invisible costs.<\/p>\n

The 3D simulations with Arbrea are under 1 minute<\/a>, and they help you to be efficient with your consultation time. All fixes are covered through updates, and you are not charged extra. You don’t need to buy equipment, because you only need an iPad or iPhone. You can carry it in your pocket or from room to room, as you might need.<\/p>\n

The Cost Behind Choosing Software Solutions<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The software solutions are the hottest thing<\/a> in the Aesthetic Medical field. Besides us, there is Crisalix and EntityMed. They are better than the hardware tools, as they are looking towards the future too. But Arbrea has some clear advantages.<\/p>\n

EntityMed competes only with myArbrea, which is our marketing booster app for plastic surgeons and aesthetic doctors. It doesn’t stand a chance against Arbrea Suite. And it’s only used for facial treatments. Therefore costs go up if you choose EntityMed, because you don’t have a software simulation for the breast. And even for the face, it is not as complete as Arbrea Suite. Meaning you will need another software solution to fill the gaps for your services.<\/p>\n

Crisalix is another matter. It’s more complete regarding EntityMed, but it still has some areas where it falls short compared to our solutions. The 3D simulation takes more time to be created. The patient data is not as secure because it’s uploaded to the cloud. To have the AR experience, you need a VR headset, which is fragile. Also, it distances the patient a little bit from themselves. And the subscription cost is higher than Arbrea’s.<\/p>\n

If you choose Arbrea, the 3D simulation is under 1 minute, and the privacy of your patients is guaranteed<\/a>. Everything is saved locally on the device and doesn’t go anywhere online, unless you decide to share it. You only need an iPhone or iPad for the AR as well.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div> <\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t

”<\/span>I was looking for a fast and patient-friendly solution that produced quick and accurate simulations. And Arbrea Labs truly delivered. <\/p>Prof. Dr. med. Reichenberger<\/span><\/span><\/div><\/blockquote>\n\t\t<\/div> \n\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n\n\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n