{"id":34685,"date":"2024-07-30T10:15:59","date_gmt":"2024-07-30T08:15:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arbrea-labs.com\/?p=34685"},"modified":"2025-03-20T17:42:11","modified_gmt":"2025-03-20T16:42:11","slug":"the-utility-of-augmented-reality-simulation-in-augmentation-mammoplasty-a-study-by-dr-michael-marion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arbrea-labs.com\/fr\/the-utility-of-augmented-reality-simulation-in-augmentation-mammoplasty-a-study-by-dr-michael-marion\/","title":{"rendered":"The Utility of Augmented Reality Simulation in Augmentation Mammoplasty: A Study by Dr. Michael Marion"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t

Augmented Reality (AR) technology is transforming various medical fields, and cosmetic surgery is no exception. One of the areas where AR has made a significant impact is augmentation mammoplasty. The ability to predict postoperative results with precision remains crucial during patient consultations. This blog post explores a scientific paper by Dr. Michael Marion<\/strong>, which was presented at the ISAPS Olympiad Athens 2023, demonstrating how AR simulation enhances patient experiences<\/a> and outcomes in breast augmentation procedures. The findings are based on recent research conducted at Marion Plastic Surgery & Medical Spa<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Study Overview<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Dr. Michael Marion<\/strong> conducted a study to evaluate the effectiveness of AR in breast augmentation using an app-based software developed by Arbrea Labs. This software allowed for the acquisition of preoperative chest measurements and provided detailed implant renderings. The study assessed patient perceptions and recommendations through a structured survey using a 5-point Likert scale.<\/p>\n

Methods<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The study involved the following steps:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Patient Selection<\/strong>: A total of 204 patients were selected for the study.<\/li>\n
  2. AR Simulation<\/strong>: The Arbrea Labs app was used to obtain preoperative chest measurements and generate implant renderings.<\/li>\n
  3. Survey<\/strong>: Patients were asked to evaluate their experience using a 5-point Likert scale, focusing on the accuracy of the AR simulations and their satisfaction with the implant selection process.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Results<\/strong><\/h2>\n

    The study found overwhelmingly positive results:<\/p>\n